TAG: ahmadinejad, donne, isalm, promiscuità, sisma, terremoti
La colpa dei terremoti è delle donne discinte e promiscue. È la tesi dei religiosi dell’Iran, uno dei Paesi più esposti al rischio sismico.
La dichiarazione segue l’annuncio fatto dal presidente della Repubblica islamica Mahmoud Ahmadinejad due settimane fa. Il leader ha previsto che presto il Paese sarà colpito da una nuova scossa, e per questo molti dei 12 milioni di iraniani dovrebbero trasferirsi in zone non pericolose.
“Molte donne che non si vestono in modo appropriato corrompono la castità degli uomini, li spingono all’adulterio, facendo così aumentare la possibilità di terremoti”, ha detto Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedigh.
Ragazze e signore, in Iran, dovrebbero essere coperte dalla testa ai piedi, ma molte, soprattutto le più giovani, ignorano questi rigidi codici di abbigliamento, indossando solo sciarpe morbide a coprire i capelli.
“Che cosa dobbiamo fare per evitare di essere sepolti sotto le macerie? si chiede Sedighi. Non c’è altra soluzione che trovare rifugio nella religionee adattare i nostri stili di vita a quelli prescritti dall’Islam”.
A confermare la tesi, anche il ministro del Welfare Sadeq Mashooli: “Le preghiere e i voti per il perdono sono le formule migliori per evitare i terremoti. Non possiamo inventare un sistema che prevenga il sisma, ma Dio ha creato quel sistema, che consiste nel rifuggire dal peccato, pregare, invocare il perdono”.
PER SAPERNE DI PIU'
GRATIS LE ULTIME NOTIZIE VIA EMAIL
I lettori scrivono
Scrivete qui i vostri commenti.
SENIOR Iranian cleric – Burka prevents earth Quakes, etc
Cognisant human beings are formed and deformed by human text. Not God. As food is fuel for our bodies human text is fuel for our thoughts and subsequent actions.
Eating the 25 points of the National Socialism (Nazi party) manifesto of 1920 clearly has the same deleterious effect as eating the “The Cow” quran manifesto on non-adherants. SENIOR Iranian cleric Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi would be advised to change his misogynistic diet.
If we had only known this sooner.
If the “dangers” of Islamic terrorism were not enough we have the attractive additional incentive (without any additional cost other than liberty and independence) of joining the motley Islamic crew to avoid being subject to grievous harm from nature as well.
Who would have thought – Cheap at half the price – with the belief the earth is flat thrown in as a non-obligatory extra.
I suppose the rumour “spending half your day bowing down to Mecca cures piles” must be true – it is not a complete waste of time after all.
Enabling these entities to spread their destructive text at our expense regards tax concisions and subsidies for educating children with this nonsense needs to be stopped.
Also, at least this again ‘exposes’ the absurd tenets for women having to wear the Burka and similar denigrating garb to reinforce the notion of men, me boss – inciting excitement – naughty.
“The woman should have been layered in half a ton of black fabric, if she had your honor I would not have raped her” – sound plausible now I have been enlightened by our SENIOR Iranian cleric Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi.
.. and lest we forget the cattle stampedes, trains hurtling through tunnels, Swiss yodelling etc.
It is now clear why that meteorite wiped out the earth millions of years ago – a girl dinosaur neglected to adjust her palm fond correctly – devastating.
Clearly the above reinforces the reality the burka is as much a political statement as a naked woman walking in the streets to advocate public nudity as a right which should be accepted by the rest of society.
Nudism is a cultural and political movement advocating and defending social nudity in private and in public. It may also refer to a lifestyle based on personal, family and/or social nudism.
Society in general has decided public nudism can be very confronting, inappropriate, and even regarded as obscene by some. Although nudism is often practiced in a person’s home or garden, either alone or with members of the family public and in restricted venues public nudity is a behaviour which society in general have deemed should be restricted and subject to judicial penalty.
In my opinion the burka is much more of an obscenity than nudity. For where nudism seeks to expand the societal bounds and diminish prejudice the burka politically advocates a denigrating , subservient role in society for women.
The burka reinforces the notion women are not only to blame for men’s behaviour towards them in regards sexual assaults but also women’s aspirations should be necessarily be different and subservient to a man’s definition of what a woman’s life should be.
The public wearing of the burka is a categorical political act which seeks to advance the notion of the acceptance of the subservience and restriction of women’s opportunities in life relative to men which is absolutely obscene and must therefore be subject to judicial penalty.
Everything we do is political. A woman deciding to wear shorts given human history is a political statement in itself. For it can be deemed as simply a relatively freely decided fashion statement. The Burka is an antitheist of this and very much a political statement of subjugation and in no way can be regarded as a fashion statement or a modern principle. No matter how many times and subtle colourful variations get dragged down the catwalk.
[...] [http://www.blitzquotidiano.it/] [...]